Tag Archives: Innovation

The Tyranny of Routine

The lazy man works twice as hard.  My mother told that to me, and now I say it to my kids.  If you’re writing an essay, keep it in the lines and in the margins so you don’t have to do it over.

Gary Oldman, Esquire Magazine, What I’ve Learned, December 16, 2011

Technology is not magic.  We can place it in the classroom, but without seamless integration into the curriculum, and innovative application, we might as well be using number 2 pencils.

When it comes to innovation, educational institutions are not very different from other organizations.   Change is hard and routine can often  be the enemy of progress.  This is true of education, whether it is at home or in the classroom.

Whether you are a parent like me, or a teacher, it is important for us to understand the dangers of routine.   Routine can choke innovation.

How can this happen?  Those who parent or teach can use routine for themselves, but fail to understand its impact on those they are attempting to educate.  For instance, we often use routines to keep ourselves from feeling out of control.

  1. Routine can keep us from being overwhelmed
  2. It helps us feel in control
  3. It helps us feel secure
  4. It protects and shelters us from the uncertainty of change
  5. It keeps things moving even though we are uninspired
  6. It allows us to reuse the old, rather than develop the new
  7. It limits how much we have to prepare

Routines tyrannize our lives.  We become dependent on them to keep our lives sane, and when innovation requires that we set them aside, we are unable to do it.  When this happens routine becomes destructive.

  1. Routine makes no breakthroughs
  2. It has no vision
  3. It sees no need for innovation
  4. It stifles creativity

Here is some questions I am asking myself.

  1. What routines are keeping me from making breakthroughs?
  2. What routines are keeping me from utilizing technology to help my children make breakthroughs?
  3. What routines are preventing my children’s teacher’s from making classroom breakthroughs?

These are just a few musings on routine.  They have been helpful to me, and I hope they are helpful to you.

Share

Education + Technology = Hope

A child miseducated is a child lost

John F. Kennedy

A significant number of social and economic maladies afflicting every country can be attributed to a lack of education.  Nearly every negative social and economic statistic would decline, if we were more effective in educating our populations.

Education is powerful, it changes lives.  The education I am describing is about more than information transfer.  It is more than teaching curriculum.  It takes place both in and outside school classrooms.  It reaches into the heart and mind of the individual, and changes things.  It changes the way we see the world, and the way we see ourselves.  It expands the imagination, orders our priorities, and develops our dreams.

Education remakes us.

Attention

My mom was a teacher.  She did her best teaching at home.  I learned early about the extraordinary journey one could take through a book…to distant lands…to amazing times in the past.  At my fingertips were books of all types, including comic books, and among the latter were those of the Shakespeare variety.

When my older sisters returned from school with homework, I verbally yearned for homework of my own.  My mom and dad made education interesting, compelling, and attractive.  By the time I entered the classroom, the teachers work had been made easy.  She already had my attention.

Attention is not nearly as easy to get as it was in my day, but it is no less essential to the learning process.  Education cannot remake, unless it can hold attention.  Technology can help.  In fact, it is essential.

Relics

The classroom is a relic, left over from the Industrial Revolution, which required a large workforce with very basic skills. Classroom-based education lags far behind when measured against its ability to deliver the creative and agile workforce that the 21st century demands. This is already evidenced by our nation’s shortage of high-tech and other skilled workers—a trend that is projected to grow in coming years.

Prakash Nair, The Classroom Is Obsolete,

Education Week, July 29, 2011

Without the seamless integration of technology into the classroom of the 21st century, it will remain a relic of times gone by, a place best suited for regurgitation.

Regurgitation Education

Many a child has left a classroom capable of regurgitating information, but they have not been educated.  They haven’t even been informed.  They certainly haven’t been taught to think.  These are those who have learned how to game the system, and when they enter the work force, this is exactly what they will do.

Instead, most of them endure what I call ‘regurgitation education’ and are stuck in institutions that expect them to memorize the periodic table, the names of 50 state capitals and the major rivers of the United States.

John Merrow, The Influence of Teachers

These system thinkers won’t build or create.  Their only focus will be, how can they get what they want out of the system.  In school they want grades, and work the system for academic profit.  In the workforce they want money, and work the system for financial profit.  They don’t create, build, or change anything.  All they do is take…and the world will be the worse for their success.

These are those, who to use the words of John F. Kennedy were “miseducated”. The education they received made their worlds smaller not larger, and as a consequence their dreams became more selfish.

If we leave the classroom untouched, we can expect more of the same.

Hope

We have to restore hope to education, which means understanding a test can measure a child’s retention, but it can never know their mind.  This is why teachers are so important, they can see what a test will never tell you.  It is also why technology is important, because it can help us overcome the human limits, which suppress our potential.

Teachers properly equipped and trained in the use of technology can interest the uninterested, captivate the gifted, and level the playing field for those with disabilities.  In short, this dynamic duo possesses the ability to make more people successful.  Despite this truth, we are slow to embrace it’s use in a significant way.

Why are we slow to embrace technology?

The proper embrace of technology in the classroom will prove to be disruptive, and create an environment where the system can no longer be gamed.  While this will be good for many, it will be unpredictable for some.

When the poor have access to the same tools as the rich…things change.  When the disadvantaged can travel to Paris without leaving their living room, and speak French with a citizen of France through Skype…having the money to travel loses its advantages.

If the verbally challenged person with autism can turn an iPad into a communication device, he or she can be included in society.  They can build relationships, make contributions, and add diversity to a world which is learning to accept everything except disability.

Technology has begun to change the world, but until it is allowed to disrupt the classroom we will only see a shadow of what is possible.

This is why I believe…

Technology + Education = Hope

 

Share

Quick Talk: The Autism Communication Experiment

Eric Ries is releasing a new book called “The Lean Startup”.  He was interviewed by  Adam Penenberg of Fast Company.  You can find the interview here.

The article initially left me underwhelmed, but then it turned to the subject of breaking rules and taking risks.

Its funny but at IMVU we thought we were releasing something buggy that no one would use. This was after trying to release something perfect. We have all been taught to do our best work, because you never get a second chance to make a first impression. But if you don’t know who your customer is you don’t know what quality is. We didn’t really know what our customers would want. So we used product launches as an experiment to find out.

Ries is talking about his evolution from conventional to unconventional developer.  Becoming someone willing to take risks.  These words reminded me of our endeavor to create, build, and release our Quick Talk app.  We took a risk creating this software.

  1. We wanted to help functionally non-verbal kids with autism
  2. We wanted to give them a communication tool
  3. We wanted the software to be mobile, simple, and flexible
  4. We wanted the software to be cheap
  5. We wanted to launch our first app on Android
These five goals were all high risk for the reasons that follow:
  1. I learned a quick lesson, when trying to convince top software developers in the heart of Silicon Valley to work on Quick Talk.  They do not work on autism communication software for the functionally non-verbal.  It simply doesn’t pay the bills.  
  2. Quality mobile, simple, and flexible software isn’t cheap to make.
  3. The Apple iOS owns the autism and education markets.
Despite these risks we decided to build the software.  Creating a “we” wasn’t easy, but good fortune provided me with a team of developers willing to work on Quick Talk.  It couldn’t be the top priority, but would definitely be our consuming passion.  We decided to start on an Android version immediately, leaving the iOS version for a later date.

Starting on Android was the right decision, because compared to the iOS it had a better chance of being mobile, simple, flexible, and cheap (additionally there have been 6 billion downloads for Android market..check story here.)

Once completed we sought the input of the same parents, kids, and therapists who gave us our initial ideas.   They were positive, but seeing the software gave them even more ideas, and provided us with some valuable critiques.

My wife’s initial response was most valuable.  She said, “I like it, but where are the pictures”.   Her point was spot on.  While I was excited about our ability to make this software mobile, simple, and flexible–her one question had exposed a weakness in functionality.  It assumed literacy.  While this wasn’t our intent, it was the result.  What to do?

Should we release our software, and risk rejection because it lacked pictures? We decided we could handle critique, failure or rejection, but not the idea of even one verbally challenged child or adult waiting for a tool that could help them.

This decision reminded me of how Eric Ries described the feelings which come when we take risks.

It becomes a rigorous process, and the sooner you find out what your customers think and want the sooner you can pivot toward an ultimately successful company. If you get a negative result to your experiment–let’s say you learn that people can’t stand your product–you can pivot to a new strategy. Of course you need a high pain threshold.

We released the software, and quickly discovered it was helping people.  At the same time, my wife’s initial observation about the necessity of pictures was reiterated by more than a few.

Fortunately for us, we had listened to my wife and others, so this update is in the pipeline.  It will contain some cool picture capabilities, as well as audio recording.

The other lessons we have learned have been equally as helpful.  They were unexpected but cool…very worthwhile…invaluable.

  1. Functionally non-verbal is a term we adopted from experts.  We discovered parents were not using this term to describe their kids. Since their children have some form of verbal communication, they considered them to be verbally challenged.  This is the term we have decided to adopt.
  2. The parents, teachers and therapist using Quick Talk, are not only using it to give their children a voice.  They are also using it to help them develop language.  This has increased the urgent desire for picture capability.
  3. While the general autism population receives a great deal of attention, the verbally challenged autism population is under served.
  4. Those within the autism community, and specifically those effected by verbal challenges are not easily reached.   No one place exists, where you can easily make tools like ours available to families.
  5. The Quick Talk app placed us in a niche called Alternative Augmentative Communication (AAC)/Assitive Technology (AT). This is a vibrant and growing area, but remains in its infancy.  There appears to be a great deal of room for discovery in this space.
  6. We discovered we are an Education and Technology company, which has widened our vision of what we can do.  Why not develop tools for both typical and special needs kids?
  7. Apple owns the education and even autism phone and tablet market.  The majority of schools, therapist, and parents see the Android market as a second option.  This is both a challenge and opportunity for Google and its partners.   The challenge is to develop a clear vision for the education market, which really means investing in Education & Technology companies.
  8. Special needs families need more disruptive forces in their part of the technology market.   Prices need to be driven lower.  Choices need to be expanded, by including insurance coverage for consumer tablets and mobile devices (not only products provided by companies who serve the disability communities).
Share

Built In The Garage

When Audrey Waters wrote “Is This The Year of The Educational Tablet“, Digital Scribbler a distant dream.   Now we have been fortunate enough to have her able pen write about the work we are doing.

One of my favorite lines comes at the beginning.

“Built in the garage” has long been a powerful origin story for technology companies, but now it’s even easier for this sort of thing to occur.

Please give Autism, Assistive Tech, and App Development a read.

Share